<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/electric-power/RSS">
  <title>Electric Power</title>
  <link>https://archive.ceres.org</link>

  <description>
    
      Ceres electric power related reports
    
  </description>

  

  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2011-02-08T15:41:20Z</syn:updateBase>
        

  <image rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2016"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/clean-energy-utility-benchmarking-report-2016"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/pathway-to-a-21st-century-electric-utility"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/accelerating-u.s.-clean-energy-deployment-investor-policy-priorities"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-unites-states-2015"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation-2014-update"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-utility-clean-energy-deployment-2014"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-forward-supplement-climate-and-energy-targets-set-by-fortune-500-companies"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2014"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap-executive-summary"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-factor-institutional-investors2019-policy-priorities-can-bring-energy-efficiency-to-scale"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation"/>
      
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2016">
    <title>Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States 2016</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2016</link>
    <description>This report analyzed publicly reported data on carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and mercury emissions from the nation’s 100 largest electric power producers, which account for 85 percent of the nation’s power production. The report concludes that since 2000 emissions of all four major pollutants have dropped while total electricity generation and the American economy have grown.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><span>This report analyzed publicly reported data on carbon dioxide (CO</span><sub>2</sub><span>), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO</span><sub>2</sub><span>), and mercury emissions from the nation’s 100 largest electric power producers, which account for 85 percent of the nation’s power production.</span><span> </span></p>
<p><span></span><span>The report concludes that since 2000 emissions of all four major pollutants have dropped while total electricity generation and the American economy have grown.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Laura Devenney</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2016-07-13T09:40:39Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/clean-energy-utility-benchmarking-report-2016">
    <title>Clean Energy Utility Benchmarking Report: 2016</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/clean-energy-utility-benchmarking-report-2016</link>
    <description>Benchmarking Utility Clean Energy Deployment: 2016 provides a window into how the global transition toward clean energy is playing out in the U.S. electric power sector. Specifically, it reveals the extent to which 30 of the largest U.S. investor-owned electric utility holding companies are increasingly deploying clean energy resources to meet customer needs.

</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><i>Benchmarking Utility Clean Energy Deployment: 2016</i><span> provides a window into how the global transition toward clean energy is playing out in the U.S. electric power sector. Specifically, it reveals the extent to which 30 of the largest U.S. investor-owned electric utility holding companies are increasingly deploying clean energy resources to meet customer needs.</span></p>
<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span>Benchmarking these companies provides an opportunity for transparent reporting and analysis of important industry trends. It fills a knowledge gap by offering utilities, regulators, investors, policymakers and other stakeholders consistent and comparable information on which to base their decisions. And it provides perspective on which utilities are best positioned in a shifting policy landscape, including likely implementation of the U.S. EPA’s Clean Power Plan aimed at reducing carbon pollution from power plants.</span></p>
<p>Download the report to view the rankings and to learn more.</p>
<p><i>Note: This version of the report includes updated renewable energy data for American Electric Power shown in Figure 10.</i></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Laura Devenney</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2016-06-28T03:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/pathway-to-a-21st-century-electric-utility">
    <title>Pathway to a 21st Century Electric Utility</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/pathway-to-a-21st-century-electric-utility</link>
    <description>Utilities do an excellent job of  what they are mandated to do— provide safe, reliable and affordable energy. Utilities are not going away, because we require them to operate the electric grid, so why not expand the scope of their mandate to manage an environment in which consumers use energy and electricity more efficiently to create customer value and optimize the electricity system for the benefit of all? In this environment, utilities will be incented to maximize customer and system value, as opposed to simply building infrastructure. 

Given the importance of revising the utility industry model for the benefit of customers, society and utility investors, this paper is an expression of Peter H. Kind's evolved views in an effort to find common ground that will support a robust 21st Century Utility model. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><span>Utilities do an excellent job of  what they are mandated to do— provide safe, reliable and affordable energy. Utilities are not going away, because we require them to operate the electric grid, so why not expand the scope of their mandate to manage an environment in which consumers use energy and electricity more efficiently to create customer value and optimize the electricity system for the benefit of all? In this environment, utilities will be incented to maximize customer and system value, as opposed to simply building infrastructure.</span></p>
<p>Given the importance of revising the utility industry model for the benefit of customers, society and utility investors, this paper is an expression of Peter H. Kind's evolved views in an effort to find common ground that will support a robust 21st Century Utility model.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Laura Devenney</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2015-11-09T11:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/accelerating-u.s.-clean-energy-deployment-investor-policy-priorities">
    <title>Accelerating U.S. Clean Energy Deployment: Investor Policy Priorities</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/accelerating-u.s.-clean-energy-deployment-investor-policy-priorities</link>
    <description>International investment to mitigate climate change is far below levels needed to reach the two-degree target. The International Energy Agency estimates that an average of an additional $1 trillion in incremental financing for clean energy is needed to meet the temperature target. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><span>International investment to mitigate climate change is far below levels needed to reach the two-degree target. The International Energy Agency estimates that an average of an additional $1 trillion in incremental financing for clean energy is needed to meet the temperature target. In September 2014, over 350 investors representing $24 trillion in assets issued the Global Investor Statement on Climate Change, calling on governments to create an ambitious global agreement that includes a meaningful price on carbon — the “Clean Trillion.”</span></p>
<div></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">This paper connects the Clean Trillion goal to the current United States climate and clean energy policy framework, which is a mixture of federal, state, and local initiatives. The paper outlines the 2015 U.S. policy priorities of the Policy Working Group of the Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR), a network of more than 110 institutional investors primarily based in the U.S., focused on investment risks and opportunities associated with climate change.</div>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Laura Devenney</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2015-09-08T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-unites-states-2015">
    <title>Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States 2015</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-unites-states-2015</link>
    <description>The 2015 Benchmarking report is the eleventh collaborative effort highlighting environmental performance and progress in the nation’s electric power sector. The Benchmarking series uses publicly reported data to compare the emissions performance of the 100 largest power producers in the United States. The current report is based on 2013 generation and emissions data.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The 2015 Benchmarking report is the eleventh collaborative effort highlighting environmental performance and progress in the nation’s electric power sector. The Benchmarking series uses publicly reported data to compare the emissions performance of the 100 largest power producers in the United States. The current report is based on 2013 generation and emissions data.</p>
<p>This report examines and compares the stack air pollutant emissions of the 100 largest power producers in the United States based on their 2013 generation, plant ownership, and emissions data. The report focuses on four power plant pollutants for which public emissions data are available: sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), mercury (Hg), and carbon dioxide (CO2). These pollutants are associated with significant environmental and public health problems, including acid deposition, global warming, fine particle air pollution, mercury deposition, nitrogen deposition, ozone smog, and regional haze.</p>
<p>Key findings of the report include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Air pollution emissions from power plants are highly concentrated among a small number of producers.  Among the 100 largest generators:</li>
<ul>
<li>Five (Duke, AEP, Southern, NRG, and MidAmerican) generate 25 percent of CO2 emissions, though Southern has seen a significant decline in emissions (27 percent) since 2000, and Duke has seen a 10 percent decline in its emissions rate even after its recent merger with Progress Energy.</li>
<li>Three (AEP, Southern, and NRG) generate nearly 25 percent of SO2 emissions.</li>
</ul>
<li>SO2 and NOX emissions in 2013 were 80 percent and 74 percent lower, respectively, than they were in 1990, when major amendments to the Clean Air Act were passed.</li>
<li>Mercury emissions have decreased 50 percent since 2000, when the industry was first required to report their mercury emissions to EPA.</li>
<li>Coal accounted for 40 percent of the power produced by the top 100 power producers, followed by natural gas at 26 percent, nuclear at 22 percent, and renewable power, including large hydroelectric, and other at 14 percent.</li>
<li>The utilization, or capacity factors, of coal plants continues to decline relative to natural gas plants, with coal plants’ average utilization rates declining from 73 to 61 percent, and natural gas plants increasing their utilization from 40 to 48 percent between 2008 and 2014.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2015-07-14T12:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation-2014-update">
    <title>Practicing Risk-Aware Electricity Regulation: 2014 Update</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation-2014-update</link>
    <description>This 2014 update to Ceres' 2012 report, Practicing Risk-Aware Electricity Regulation: What Every State Regulator Needs to Know, looks at key trends that continue to reshape the U.S. electricity industry, analyzes changing costs and risk profiles of energy resources (especially renewable energy), and offers further insights and recommendations for smart, “risk-aware” decision-making by utility regulators.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div class="column">
<p><span>This </span><span>2014 update to Ceres' 2012 report, <i>Practicing Risk-Aware Electricity Regulation: What Every State Regulator Needs to Know,</i> </span><span>looks at key trends that continue to reshape the U.S. electricity industry, analyzes changing costs and risk profiles of energy resources (especially renewable energy), and offers further insights and recommendations</span><span> for smart, “risk-aware” decision-making by utility regulators. </span></p>
<p><span>This report, authored by utility industry and finance experts, concludes that almost without exception the riskiest investments for utilities—the ones that could cause the most financial harm for utilities, ratepayers and investors—are large base load fossil fuel and nuclear plants. In contrast, energy efficiency, distributed energy and renewable energy (whose costs, in some cases, have come down dramatically since 2012) are seen as more attractive investments that have lower risks and cost.</span></p>
<p><span>This </span><span>2014 Update </span><span>reaffirms the conclusions and recommendations from our 2012 report, which emphasized the need for intelligent risk management practices by utility regulators in overseeing utility investment. </span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-11-17T14:08:47Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-utility-clean-energy-deployment-2014">
    <title>Benchmarking Utility Clean Energy Deployment 2014</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-utility-clean-energy-deployment-2014</link>
    <description>Benchmarking Utility Clean Energy Deployment assembles data from more than 10 sources, including state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) annual reports, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 10-K filings and Public Utility Commission reports, to show how 32 of the largest U.S. investor-owned electric utility holding companies stack up on renewable energy and energy efficiency.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>Benchmarking Utility Clean Energy Deployment</i> assembles data from more than 10 sources, including state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) annual reports, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 10-K filings and Public Utility Commission reports, to show how 32 of the largest U.S. investor-owned electric utility holding companies stack up on renewable energy and energy efficiency.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Brian Sant</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-07-21T14:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-forward-supplement-climate-and-energy-targets-set-by-fortune-500-companies">
    <title>Power Forward Supplement: Climate and Energy Targets set by Fortune 500 Companies</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-forward-supplement-climate-and-energy-targets-set-by-fortune-500-companies</link>
    <description>This table is a supplemental document listing all the goals to the report: Power Forward: How American Companies are Setting Clean Energy Targets and Capturing Greater Business Value.
</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>This table is a supplemental document listing all the goals to the report: <a href="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/reports/power-forward-2.0-how-american-companies-are-setting-clean-energy-targets-and-capturing-greater-business-value/view" class="external-link"><i>Power Forward: How American Companies are Setting Clean Energy Targets and Capturing Greater Business Value</i></a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-06-19T12:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2014">
    <title>Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States 2014</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states-2014</link>
    <description>This report examines and compares the stack air pollutant emissions of the 100 largest power producers in the United States based on their 2012 generation, plant ownership, and emissions data and shows a downward trend in nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxides (SO2), mercury and carbon dioxide (CO2) since 2000, with CO2 emissions decreasing 13 percent between 2008 and 2012.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i> </i><span>This report examines and compares the stack air pollutant emissions of the 100 largest power producers in the United States based on their 2012 generation, plant ownership, and emissions data and shows a downward trend in nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxides (SO<sub>2</sub>), mercury and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) since 2000, with CO<sub>2</sub> emissions decreasing 13 percent between 2008 and 2012.  The findings  show that the industry is already shifting toward a combination of  increased energy efficiency and lower carbon fuel sources.</span></p>
<div id="viewlet-above-content">
<div id="plone-lock-status"></div>
</div>
<p><b>Key findings of the report include: </b></p>
<ul>
<li>NOx and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions in 2012 were 74 percent and 79  percent lower, respectively, than they were in 1990 when Congress passed  major amendments to the Clean Air Act.  Mercury emissions decreased 51  percent since 2000.</li>
<li>CO<sub>2</sub> emissions have decreased in recent years, declining  13 percent between 2008 and 2012. Energy efficiency improvements,  displacement of coal generation by natural gas and renewable energy  sources, and slower economic growth all contributed to the decline. </li>
<li>Coal accounted for 39 percent of the power produced by the 100  largest companies in 2012, down from 44 percent in 2011.  Roughly 18  percent of the nation’s coal-fired generating fleet (over 58,000  megawatts) has been slated for retirement since 2010.  Retiring coal  plants tend to be older and smaller than the industry average.  Also,  average utilization of coal plants (how often the plants are run) has  dropped from 73 percent in 2008 to 60 percent in 2013. </li>
<li>Across the entire electric sector, renewable energy electricity  generation increased 31 percent since 2010 (by more than 50,000 gigawatt  hours) even as total electricity generation declined modestly.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Benchmarking Air Emissions </i>is the 10<sup>th</sup> in a series   highlighting environmental improvements and progress in the nation’s   electric power sector since 1997.  The 100 power producers evaluated in   the report represent 86 percent of the electric power generated in the   U.S. and 87 percent of the industry’s pollution.  Based on 2012   generation and emissions data from the U.S. Energy Information   Administration and the EPA, the report is a collaborative effort between   Ceres, Bank of America, four power producers (Calpine, Entergy, Exelon   and Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG)) and the Natural Resources   Defense Council, and is authored by M.J. Bradley and Associates.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T14:54:07Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap-executive-summary">
    <title>Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing The Clean Energy Investment Gap Executive Summary</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap-executive-summary</link>
    <description>An executive summary of the Ceres report Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing The Clean Energy Investment Gap.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>An executive summary of the Ceres report<a href="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap/view" class="external-link"> <i>Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing The Clean Energy Investment Gap.</i></a></p>
<p>In 2010 world governments agreed to limit the increase in global temperature to two degrees Celsius (2 °C) above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. To have an 80 percent chance of maintaining this 2 °C limit, the IEA estimates an additional $36 trillion in clean energy investment is needed through 2050—or an average of $1 trillion more per year compared to a “business as usual” scenario over the next 36 years.</p>
<p>These new investments in clean energy—including renewable energy such as solar, wind and geothermal, energy efficiency and energy smart technologies such as power storage, fuel cells and carbon capture and storage—will provide multiple benefits. In addition to cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2050, such investment will yield significant returns in the form of reduced fuel costs. Total fuel savings are an estimated $100 trillion between 2010 and 2050. Moreover, the greater job-creation potential of energy efficiency and renewable energy relative to fossil fuels makes clear that quadrupling annual global investment in clean energy will create millions of new jobs worldwide.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap/view" class="external-link">Download the full report here.</a></strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-01-15T15:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap">
    <title>Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing The Clean Energy Investment Gap</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap</link>
    <description>In 2010 world governments agreed to limit the increase in global temperature to two degrees Celsius (2 °C) above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. To have an 80 percent chance of maintaining this 2 °C limit, the IEA estimates an additional $36 trillion in clean energy investment is needed through 2050—or an average of $1 trillion more per year compared to a “business as usual” scenario over the next 36 years.

This Ceres report provides 10 recommendations for investors, companies and policymakers to increase annual global investment in clean energy to at least $1 trillion by 2030—roughly a four-fold jump from current investment levels.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>In 2010 world governments agreed to limit the increase in global temperature to two degrees Celsius (2 °C) above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. To have an 80 percent chance of maintaining this 2 °C limit, the IEA estimates an additional $36 trillion in clean energy investment is needed through 2050—or an average of $1 trillion more per year compared to a “business as usual” scenario over the next 36 years.</p>
<p>This Ceres report provides 10 recommendations for investors, companies and policymakers to increase annual global investment in clean energy to at least $1 trillion by 2030—roughly a four-fold jump from current investment levels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-01-15T15:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-factor-institutional-investors2019-policy-priorities-can-bring-energy-efficiency-to-scale">
    <title>Power Factor: Institutional Investors’ Policy Priorities Can Bring Energy Efficiency to Scale</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/power-factor-institutional-investors2019-policy-priorities-can-bring-energy-efficiency-to-scale</link>
    <description>Research shows climate change could impose a multi-trillion dollar burden on the global economy and contribute ten percent of overall risk within institutional investment portfolios. Institutional investors, who manage tens of trillions of dollars globally, are actively looking for ways to mitigate these climate-related risks. Energy efficiency offers one such opportunity for institutional investors to manage the risks of climate change while earning a competitive rate of return on their investment.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Research shows climate change could impose a multi-trillion dollar burden on the global economy and contribute ten percent of overall risk within institutional investment portfolios. Institutional investors, who manage tens of trillions of dollars globally, are actively looking for ways to mitigate these climate-related risks. Energy efficiency offers one such opportunity for institutional investors to manage the risks of climate change while earning a competitive rate of return on their investment.</p>
<p>Industry analysts have estimated the potential energy efficiency investment opportunity in the hundreds of billions of dollars. However, under current market conditions, institutional investors are largely unable to finance energy efficiency projects at the scale necessary to address climate change or to meet their own internal investment criteria. At sufficient size, a market for energy efficiency loans could present an attractive investment opportunity for institutions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T13:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions">
    <title>Benchmarking Air Emissions</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions</link>
    <description>This report analyzes the latest emissions from the 100 largest power producers in the U.S. The report shows that the electric industry cut emissions of NOx, SO2 and CO2 in 2011 even as overall electricity generation increased, largely due to increased use of natural gas and growing reliance on renewable energy.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>This report analyzes the latest emissions from the 100 largest power producers in the U.S. The report shows that the electric industry cut emissions of NOx, SO2 and CO2 in 2011 even as overall electricity generation increased, largely due to increased use of natural gas and growing reliance on renewable energy.</p>
<p>Based on the latest available data, the report also reveals that Wyoming, Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana, and North Dakota had the highest CO2 emissions per megawatt-hour of power produced, while Idaho, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, and Maine had the lowest CO2 emissions rates. Nationwide, five power producers—American Electric Power, Duke Energy, FirstEnergy, Southern Company, and Tennessee Valley Authority—generate 25 percent of overall electric sector CO2 emissions, though some of these producers and others have significantly reduced emissions in recent years.</p>
<p>The Benchmarking Air Emissions report is the ninth in a series highlighting environmental performance and progress in the nation’s electric power sector.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T12:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states">
    <title>Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States 2012</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/benchmarking-air-emissions-of-the-100-largest-electric-power-producers-in-the-united-states</link>
    <description>A new report on U.S. power plant emissions from the top 100 power producers demonstrates the impact of the electric power industry’s current transition to cleaner energy sources.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left; ">The latest data on top 100 power producers show declining SO<sub>2</sub>, NOx and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and increasing use of energy efficiency and renewables.</p>
<p>The 2012 Benchmarking report is the eighth report in a series highlighting environmental performance and progress in the nation’s electric power sector. The report is based on 2010 generation and emissions data from the Energy Information Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, and also includes analysis of preliminary 2011 emissions data. The previous edition reported on 2008 data.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-07-31T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation">
    <title>Practicing Risk-Aware Electricity Regulation: What Every State Regulator Needs to Know</title>
    <link>https://archive.ceres.org/resources/reports/practicing-risk-aware-electricity-regulation</link>
    <description>This report is primarily addressed to state regulatory utility
commissioners, who will preside over some of the most
important investments in the history of the U.S. electric power
sector during perhaps its most challenging and tumultuous
period. This report seeks to provide regulators with a thorough
discussion of risk, and to suggest an approach—“risk-aware
regulation”—whereby regulators can explicitly and proactively
seek to identify, understand and minimize the risks associated
with electric utility resource investment. It is hoped that this
approach will result in the effcient deployment of capital, the
continued financial health of utilities, and the confidence and
satisfaction of the customers on whose behalf utilities invest.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>This report is primarily addressed to state regulatory utility commissioners, who will preside over some of the most important investments in the history of the U.S. electric power sector during perhaps its most challenging and tumultuous period. This report seeks to provide regulators with a thorough discussion of risk, and to suggest an approach—“risk-aware regulation”—whereby regulators can explicitly and proactively seek to identify, understand and minimize the risks associated with electric utility resource investment. It is hoped that this approach will result in the efficient deployment of capital, the continued financial health of utilities, and the confidence and satisfaction of the customers on whose behalf utilities invest.</p>
<p>For more about this issue, listen to the <a href="https://archive.ceres.org/resources/podcasts/shifting-ground/view" class="external-link">Ceres Podcast episode with report author Ron Binz</a>, former chairman of the Colorado Public Utility Commission and principle of Public Policy Consulting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Megan Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T14:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Resource</dc:type>
  </item>





</rdf:RDF>
